In Suresh v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration and Ahani v. MCI, the Supreme Court of Canada declared that removing a refugee accused of terrorism to a country where he or she would face a substantial risk of torture or similar abuse would virtually always violate the individual’s rights under s. 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. While the Court deserves praise for vindicating fundamental human rights over competing claims of national security, coming so close on the heels of September 11, the victory is in certain respects more apparent than real. Given the strong endorsement of judicial deference to the exercise of Ministerial discretion in national security matters, the Court leaves the state wide scope to circumv...
Appulonappa and its companion case, B010, lie at the confluence of many debates about global migrati...
The security certificate process set out in Canada\u27s Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA...
This thesis examines the jurisprudence of the Refugee Protection Division of the Immigration and Ref...
In Suresh v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration and Ahani v. MCI, the Supreme Court of Canada d...
This article critically analyses the decision of the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in the ...
This article critically analyses the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in the Suresh case, esp...
The Supreme Court of Canada’s unanimous decision in Charkaoui v. Canada1 has attracted much public a...
A BEACON AGAINST THE PASSAGE AND IMPLEMENTATION OF REPRESSIVE LAWFollowing the felling, by aircraft,...
This thesis examines whether the balancing of security interests against refoulement to torture, as ...
This paper examines the role of unimplemented international treaty norms in the Canadian domestic le...
This article uses constitutional discourses on the legality of security certificates to shed light o...
The Supreme Court of Canada judgment in Khadr rules that the Charter applies to the actions of Canad...
This article uses constitutional discourses on the legality of security certificates to shed light o...
In 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada released its judgment in Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Pr...
Abousfian Abdelrazik is a Canadian citizen who, after having his name added to various anti-terroris...
Appulonappa and its companion case, B010, lie at the confluence of many debates about global migrati...
The security certificate process set out in Canada\u27s Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA...
This thesis examines the jurisprudence of the Refugee Protection Division of the Immigration and Ref...
In Suresh v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration and Ahani v. MCI, the Supreme Court of Canada d...
This article critically analyses the decision of the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in the ...
This article critically analyses the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in the Suresh case, esp...
The Supreme Court of Canada’s unanimous decision in Charkaoui v. Canada1 has attracted much public a...
A BEACON AGAINST THE PASSAGE AND IMPLEMENTATION OF REPRESSIVE LAWFollowing the felling, by aircraft,...
This thesis examines whether the balancing of security interests against refoulement to torture, as ...
This paper examines the role of unimplemented international treaty norms in the Canadian domestic le...
This article uses constitutional discourses on the legality of security certificates to shed light o...
The Supreme Court of Canada judgment in Khadr rules that the Charter applies to the actions of Canad...
This article uses constitutional discourses on the legality of security certificates to shed light o...
In 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada released its judgment in Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Pr...
Abousfian Abdelrazik is a Canadian citizen who, after having his name added to various anti-terroris...
Appulonappa and its companion case, B010, lie at the confluence of many debates about global migrati...
The security certificate process set out in Canada\u27s Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA...
This thesis examines the jurisprudence of the Refugee Protection Division of the Immigration and Ref...